This movie proves that one man can change the views of many others. Henry Fonda saw throughout the case what was wrong with the people's testimony. He saw that all the pieces did not fit the way they should. The other eleven however thought the pieces fitted just right. Most of the jurors did not care; they just wanted to get out of there. They forgot that there was a young man's life was in danger.
The man who was always angry was mad at his son and he thought that saying this young man was guilty, was a way at getting back at his son. At the end of the movie he broke down crying and realized this was not a way to get back at his son so therefore he changed his vote to not guilty.
The baseball fanatic did not care about the case. He just wanted to see the Yankees play. He would get mad at Henry Fonda because he was keeping them there. Through the movie he started to realize that the Yankee's game didn't matter, and that the case was more important. He changed his vote to not guilty.
The bigot always referred to the race of the young man. He would always say "them". He thought just because the kid was a different race, he is a bad kid and must have killed his father. But as the movie went on, the evidence was not clear at all and the bigot realized that. So he changed his vote to not guilty.
The cold logical stockbroker was a very boring person. He looked at the evidence and the testimony as truths. He didn't take in the other possibilities. If the woman saw the young man kill his dad, he then had to kill his dad. If the man in the apartment downstairs heard the young man say " I'm going to kill you" then the young man must have killed his father. But once again Henry Fonda changed the stockbroker's mind. He voted not guilty. .
The juror who identifies with the young man first says he is guilty but he changed his mind because he also saw threw the evidence. I think he was the second one to vote not guilty.
Twelve Angry Men In the play "Twelve Anger Men" there is a lot of times where the jurors get angry. ... Until the men do not take being in the jury seriously. ... In act 2 get angry when number three says that he would like to pull the switch on the boy. ... Right at the beginning of act 2 it says that number 10 is angry because a person changed their vote. ... In Act 2 number eleven get angry. ...
12 Angry Men The movie 12 Angry Men intensely illustrates the trial by jury process that we use in our judicial systems in the United States. ... They range from men growing up in the slums to successful business types, also throwing in the average middle class Americans. ... The vote is held and it is 11 guilty and one not guilty, though some of the men looked hesitant to vote that way. ... The second vote is cast and the results are 10 to 2. ... Though the jury members too easily confirmed the facts in 12 Angry Men to be wrong, this could actually happen to a poor person with a court...
12 Angry Man By Reginald Rose In the 1950's, Reginald Rose penned his masterpiece, 12 Angry Men. This play introduces us to twelve men of various statures. All of these men are part of the jury who will decide the fate of a young man, who has been accused of murdering his father. ... The men have various reasons for voting the ways they do. ... I've got tickets to The Seven Year Itch tonight" , or No. 2 who is "a meek, hesitant man who finds it difficult to maintain any opinions of his own. ...
Analysis of Lessons Learned "12 Angry Men" 1. ... These experiences shape our personalities. 2. ... Cobb (juror #12) were playing Holly 12 Angry Men This movie was a great example of group interaction and the difficulties that can arise. ... Kym Bailey Lessons Learned from 12 Angry Men 1. ... Further, some of the jurors were disdainful of other jurors for many reasons: age, country of origin, occupation, social status and race. 2. ...
In the play 12 Angry Men, it took quite some time for the jury to reach their decision on whether the young man was guilty or not about his father's murder. ... The woman saw 2 figures as the el train ran by in front of her. ... It is important to get every opinion out in the opinion because even just 1 doubt, as seen in 12 Angry Men, can change a person's fate....
The Movie that I choose to do my first assignment on is entitles American Pie 2. ... This is almost exactly how the characters of American Pie 2 were portrayed. ... The movie failed to show the things that could arise from these random hookup such as unwanted pregnancy or STDs Another negative aspects about drinking portrayed accurately in American Pie 2 is men taking full advantage of a women he knows has had too much to drink to make decisions. ... Things start to get broke, people start getting rowdy when they"re drunk and on occasion fights break out between angry drunks. ... I t...
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide an analysis of the movie "12 Angry Men" relative to conflict resolution. ... Juror #2 is not taken seriously because he has a weak personality and feels the others squash his contributions. ... He won the respect of Juror #2 with something as simple as accepting a cough drop from him. ...
GCSE Drama, Paper 1, Unit 2, Task 2, The Development Phase AO2 For this part of the Development Phase, we have chosen to focus the workshop in which we were devising a particular play. ... This devised piece is an explorative strategy to understand the differences between men and women. ... All the characters except for the girl seem to be angry and happy at the same time. They are all angry with the girl, but are calm with everybody else. This ties in with the fact that women are not as respected men were in those days. ...