The Anti-Federalist and the Fight for States Rights and Small Government.
At the Constitutional Convention of 1787 a group of delegates, lead by Alexander Hamilton and James Madison proposed the adoption of a new system of government for the former English Colonies in the New World. At the time of the ratification of the United States Constitution in 1791 those who supported it where called Federalist and those who didn't where called Anti-Federalist. The Anti-Federalist feared that with the adoption of a centralized national government the rights of individuals would diminish and the newly won powers of the 13 American States would be usurped. The essential argument of the Anti-Federalist was that the building of a large centralized government would rob the people of there newly found liberty. They favored a less extreme approach, one that would work to improve the existing system of government framed in the Articles of Confederation. The Anti-Federalist preferred the union as it was "well constructed and protective of its citizen's liberties."".
They believed as Montesquieu did that democracy could only succeed in a small nearly homogeneous republic. Based on this belief the Anti-Federalist argued that against the adoption of the Constitution. Most important to the Anti-Federalist was the safeguarding of personal freedom and the sovereignty of the people. In the mind of the Anti-Federalist the ideal system was the one that was "the least burdensome- and still defended the rights and liberties of the people. The Anti-federalist where working to create a system of government that was centered on the different and individual characters of each region of America. They sought to frame a nation in which the people declared their ultimate sovereignty and power and closely delegated this power to a selected few to administer the confederacy. .
While the federalist aimed to control minority faction through a system of checks and balance, the Anti-Federalist wished to eliminate faction as much as possible.