Socrates never argued directly for his own ideas, but rather questioned those of others, from the questions he asked and his attitude toward the answers he received, Socrates audience was able to learn something about his views. This style of Socrates is almost identical to the apology- in the speech of defense Socrates does not directly deny the charges against him. Rather Socrates questions Meletus" wisdom concerning issues of the charges and by Meletus" answers Socrates is able to show that Meletus may be wrong in his accusation.
Socrates: well, dear friend, is that what you think? I acknowledge no gods at all?.
Meletus: No, none whatever.
Socrates: for certainly it seems clear that he is contradicting himself in his indictment. It is as though he were saying " Socrates is guilty of not acknowledging gods, and acknowledges gods." Yet surely this is to jest .
(R.E Allen, 1984, 26e - 27a).
Evidently the style of the apology is an emulsion of Socrates" methods or style of philosophy in his life. Therefore the philosophical aspect of the apology is a major subject and needs to be examined in terms of its success. .
In order to evaluate the philosophical success of the apology we need to identify what Socrates was trying to relate to us through his speech and assess whether he was able to do this. As a philosopher Socrates aim was to uncover the truth behind what it meant to live a truly good life. The bulk of his philosophies were therefore regarding virtues, morals and character etc. .
Socrates: to have shame at being directly refuted by the facts when I show myself in no way clever with words - that, I think, is the very height of shamelessness. Unless of course, they call a man a clever speaker if he speaks the truth.
(R.E Allen, 1984, 17b).
.
This excerpt is a subject of much debate regarding the apology, Socrates a man renowned for his dialogues and eloquent speeches, says he is not clever with words and phrases like an orator.