The Downfall of Communism in Eastern and Central Europe.
The shocking fall of communism in Eastern and Central Europe .
in the late eighties was remarkable for both its rapidity and its .
scope. The specifics of communism's demise varied among nations, .
but similarities in both the causes and the effects of these .
revolutions were quite similar. As well, all of the nations .
involved shared the common goals of implementing democratic .
systems of government and moving to market economies. In each of .
these nations, the communist regimes in power were forced to .
transfer that power to radically different institutions than they .
were accustomed to. Democracy had been spreading throughout the .
world for the preceding two decades, but with a very important .
difference. While previous political transitions had seen .
similar circumstances, the actual events in question had .
generally occurred individually. In Europe, on the other hand, .
the shift from communism was taking place in a different context .
altogether. The peoples involved were not looking to affect a .
narrow set of policy reforms; indeed, what was at stake was a .
hyper-radical shift from the long-held communist ideology to a .
western blueprint for governmental and economic policy .
development. The problem inherent in this type of monumental .
change is that, according to Ulrich K. Preuss, "In almost all the .
East and Central European countries, the collapse of .
authoritarian communist rule has released national, ethnic, .
religious and cultural conflicts which can not be solved by .
purely economic policies" (47). While tremendous changes are .
evident in both the governmental and economic arenas in Europe, .
these changes cannot be assumed to always be "mutually .
reinforcing" (Preuss 47). Generally it has been theorized that .
the most successful manner of addressing these many difficulties .
is the drafting of a constitution. But what is clear is the .
unsatisfactory ability of a constitution to remedy the problems .