.
Several researchers have suggested theoretical models of face recognitions. For example, Bruce and Young (1986) have suggested that face recognition is a serial process including several independent stages (cited in Nunn et al. 2001). Firstly, in the "structural encoding" stage the details of physical descriptions of a face are created. This stage encodes both local features such as big nose or moustache as well as configural information that considers a face as a whole unit. Bruce and Young argue that in order to recognise a familiar face "a significant overlap in perceptual similarity between the output of structural encoding stage and stored memory representations of familiar faces must be achieved" (cited in Nunn et al., 2001; p.15). This sequential model furthermore suggest that once a face is recognised, specific semantic information is accessed via "person identity nodes (PINs) which enable the retrieval of the name. Thus such stages, independent of each other would suggest that if either were damaged different deficits would be sustained. Those are namely apperceptive prosopagnosia manifested by difficulties with structural encoding of a face. This is contrasted by the associative version in which the information from the structural encoding stage are not convey to the PINs, as suggested by De Renzi 1986 (cited in Nunn at al. 2001).
The case study of the patient EP ( Nunn, Postma & Pearson, 2001) has been selected for this essay as it is one of the most illustrative examples of what is thought to be "pure" prosopagnosia i.e. visual agnosia affecting faces exclusively. Such a case, if "pure" and entirely dissociated from object agnosia and other deficits, would indeed provided an undutiful support for a face-specific module. Therefore it could than be concluded that prosopagnosia is a deficit resulting from a damage to a face recognition module. The experimental findings of this study including experiments on, neurological examination, neuropsychological assessment, basic visual skills, object recognition, visual imagery, Gestalt completion, face perception, percept inversion and within-category discrimination, do show a considerable support for such argument.