Ever since the first moon landing in 1969, sport technology has gained a huge amount of attention over the years. This has been the case due to the extensive development and use of computer technology, and on the construction of strong, but light-weight attire and equipment. It would be hard to observe which advances were more critical in terms of performance. To argue this, I'll be using biomechanical analysis as a training innovation, and fast swimsuits as an equipment advancement.
What we take away from biomechanical analysis is applying the knowledge, to train athletes to move in the most effective and efficient ways, in order to maximise exercise whilst reducing injury (Dr. Spero Karas, 2012). What tends to be seen are the biomechanics of an individual performance, like when in relation to running, things to look out for are hip extension, knee drive, and whipping of the foot and so forth. Lack of hip extension, for example, can be a result of a weakened or tight Psoas muscle. This can result in lower back pain due to compensatory hyper-extension of the lower back, and tightness of the hamstrings and quads. These compensations can increase the chances of injury (Elite Sports Therapy, 2014). Through the uses of video analysis, photography, comparative images, and slow motion replays, technology allows us explore each movement in detail. It allows us to identify problems, and to increase the biomechanical movements in such a way that is efficient and safe. Advantages to support this statement are that it gives the athlete a better understanding of the human body. The various internal, and external forces that affect ones movement, could then be applied to other movements to prevent further injuries and increase performance. However, there are limitations that are faced with regards to, "Technology benefiting all athletes." Levels ranging from amateur to elite all come into account when understanding the feedback given by ones coach.