" In order to establish both articles it is essential to first measure if it must either be a Quantitative Restriction or Measures Equivalent, relying on the rulings of court of justice, quantitative restrictions were defined in the Genddo v ente nationale Risi, 19739, as " any measures which amount to a total or partial restraint on imports or exports or goods in transit". .
In this scenario In France, Brian was able to manufacture and trade between the UK and Germany however the French have put limit on the quantity of panel saws that can be imported to the country. The case that deals with limit of products imported is of Cassis de Dijon where Germany has put "25%" on the amount of alcohol the French product contains. From this case the Court of justice stated, "Once goods have been lawfully produced and marketed in one member state, they should be free to be marketed in any other member state without restriction." (Para. 14 of Cassis de Dijon) 10 This case was in favour of France to import the alcohol because EU member state were told to respect and 'recognise' each others laws and regulations so that good may "move freely" without barriers" Court of justice. Brian can seek under the case Casis de Dijon because if it was good enough and without health risks in the UK and Germany it should be reasonable to import and sell it to manufacture in France. .
When it comes to selling arrangements it is outside Article 34 TFEU.