.
Otis does not agree with the current British government because monarchists like princes and kings are blinded by the flattery from peers or aristocrats who worship these rulers like they are chosen by the divine and have the right for full power and control to "legislate" and "execute". Otis delivers this part in co-ordination with religious teachings by saying that the law of nature from the divine gave the power in every one of the people; power in all for all. He makes it clear that the British government is unjust and failed its "divine" role when slavery and war is spread. So, Paine uses an imaginary scenario similar to that of Otis, however, Otis is merely trying to suggest changes to be done to the British system whereas Paine wants it to be removed from American and not to be involved America's "Legislative" and "Executive" decisions. .
Another similarity, however, used in contrary to Otis' style is Paine explaining through religious teachings that god does not support the idea of a king, Paine's example from the bible is god's wrath on the Jews when they decided they wanted a king. Paine adds that mankind was created by god to be equal and the idea of a king and common people is unnatural, hereditary succession adds to the problem because power and ruling right is given sometimes to people who are corrupt and incompetent. Otis uses religious teaching to actually say the power is in all for all however, it is represented by an "earthly" superior power like the government. .
Towards the end of Paine's book, one can feel the nationalism and the reasoning accumulated by the author. Paine realises the strength of the colonies and how they are sufficient enough to sense unity between them instead of waiting until their numbers increase and lose that unity sensation. Paine elaborates by explaining that no one will give them thee respect they want internationally or international support on the long run as long as America is under the British and not independent.