Truth is a concept that many philosophers, over thousands of years, wanted deeply to define. We struggle to find truth solely because it holds no generalization of its concept and is defined according to specific areas of knowledge. Areas such as mathematics and the arts are all opposite of truth. Each, in their own system, defines truth very differently because these areas claim it as only what is supported to their principles. I will be inspecting the various differences of what each area of knowledge holds to be truth and using several examples and similarities to show that to a large extent, truth differs in mathematics and the arts. .
First, it is necessary to understand the different types of truth that surround mathematics and the arts. One of the major characteristics of some forms of truth is that it can be real. This kind of truth is often seen as a truth that lacks human judgment, but attaches itself on what completely based on the principles it follows. For instance, it is true everywhere that friction between two objects will release heat based on scientific principles. Particular truth on the other hand is relative to a persons emotions or beliefs and is not an absolute or firm form of truth it is often contrasted with objective truth because of this. It is the type that is open to everyone, but the quality of the truth is unique from person to person. These two contrasting parts of truth alone mean that the concept itself cannot be universal in definition but can only do under areas of knowledge that define what truth basically is in their respective systems. .
To begin, the most noticeable area of knowledge that is centered on objective truth is mathematics. At its main, mathematics is a branch of knowledge that is completely based on a solid system of numbers, theories and proofs that leaves no room for human opinion or personal reason. It is a system that is basically declares and proves truth that only follows to its principles.