It has been tested that given the same emotional stimuli women tend.
to react only a little more physiologically than men, but tend to show a.
lot more facial recognition to the stimuli. For the most part, this holds.
true today. This can be attributed with evolutionary psychology due to a.
child mimicking the behavior of their parent. Also, I believe that the.
reasons for this occurrence attributes to labor and family roles.
It is not through DNA that women tend to show more facial expression.
in reacting to emotional stimuli. It is from watching and living with.
their parents that such attributes have progressed through time. Facial.
reaction to emotional stimuli is not something that is given to someone.
like eye color or gender; it is more something that is learned. It is a.
gender role just like the traditional idea that women should do.
housekeeping and be the main caretaker of the children as the man should.
work and provide for the family. These ideas are as old written word.
The men are supposed to be the head of the household while the women are.
subservient. Recently, with the rise of feminism and equality things have.
slowly but surely begun to change. I wouldn't be surprised if in maybe up.
to a hundred years the facial reaction to emotional stimuli of a man and.
woman has differed. For now, women's facial expressions are triggered more.
highly than those of men to an emotional stimulus, and this is due to the.
past and how men have always been traditionally stronger and hold an.
immense power over women.
In the past men were the hunters and the power figures in tribes and.
villages. If there was a battle it was almost unheard of for there to be a.
woman warrior. Men had to show strength- not weakness. For men to not.
show facial recognition in regards to emotion gave them power. It gave.
them power and equality with their fellow men and over their enemies. Not.
showing emotion in a situation would gain a man respect.