Cloning: An Issue of Scientists playing God.
Thesis: In today's society it seems as if anything can be accomplished through technology. Though most advancement is being made to help cure and care for the sick and disabled people, many believe that scientist's have gone to far and are playing the role of God. .
I. The history of cloning.
II. Ethics and cloning.
III. What the religious world is saying about cloning.
IV. Conclusion.
For years, science fiction writers have been exploring the inherent dangers of cloning humans in books such as Aldous Huxley's "Brave New World." With Dr. Ian Wilmut a Scottish scientists who had cloned a sheep, cloning has become the subject of heated ethical debate. In today's society it seems as if anything can be accomplished through technology, and that scientist's have gone to far and are playing the role of God.
In 1938, a German scientist by the name of Hans Spemann came to the conclusion that organisms can, in fact, be reproduced. His belief was that by transplanting the central element of one animal's cell into the egg of another animal, the animal could be reproduced or "cloned". Dr. Spemann believed that the central element or "nucleus" of a cell contained the genetic blueprint for the structure of the organism. He was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1935 for his discovery of what he called the "organizer effect" (Spemenn 2001).
In February 1997 a sheep named Dolly was introduced to the public. It has been said that after 276 failures, Dolly was finally produced (Love par. 22). Dr. Wilmut and his fellow biologists, who made Dolly, described that they removed "nucleus" from the adult's sheep's breast glands of a Scottish Blackface ewe. Dr. Wilmut and his colleagues then "starved" those cells, so they would stop growing and dividing. The biologists then used electricity, which caused the new "nucleus" to unite with the "enucleated oocytes", and then forced the cell's to divide.