In the article "Flag Fever: the Paradox of Patriotism," written by Blaine Harden, he insists that, only now, after the recent terrorist acts against the United States, are the citizens of the U.S. finally taking pride in and defending their country. More than 8 out of 10 Americans are now praising New York City, formerly known as the city of selfishness and sin. Citizens are now practicing their Constitutional Rights with a sense of caution. Harden calls these acts of caution, "self-appointed censors."(1) Only now, after the terrorist attacks, is the U.S. hindering what has been seen at somewhat inappropriate acts of the American citizens. Words are being watched, and hands are being slapped.
The struggle over what the flag should symbolize has been going on since 1863. Harden writes that since then, some Americans have established the flag as "primarily a symbol of equal rights and social justice under the law."(5) Now though, after the acts of September 11th, Americans are associating the flag with patriotism. In Hardens article, he suggests that the most reassuring element of patriotism, is the repeated asking from President Bush, for religious and ethnic tolerance, along with his meetings with Arab, Muslim, and Sikh leaders. A University of Maryland professor told Harden that, "as long as this continues, it bodes well for inclusion and tolerance."(5) Harden also states that President Bush has warned Americans to expect a war that is prolonged, unclear, and unsatisfying. Harden concluded that if the president is going to continue to demand a certain kind of patriotism, defense right here at home could prove as difficult as the war itself.
Strong Response to Hardens article.
Before September 11th, 2001, Americans paid little attention to patriotism. Sure, they live in the United States and know a few words to the Pledge of Allegiance, but most didn't know what true patriotism was until the terrorist acts against their country.
This helps them by hardening the enamel on baby teeth before they emurge. The second is that it helps harden the enamel on and around the adult teeth that have already emerged, helping to keep bacteria from decaying the tooth. ...
During this essay I shall explain the role and discuss the arguments for and against Juries. The Jury is a body of people who are lay, meaning that they are not legally qualified. Jury trials have become a contentious point within the English legal system. Trial by Jury is an ancient and democratic institution, meaning everybody has a say, the jury make it a trial of ones peers and in certain cases it is the jury's job to inject a certain amount of fairness and democracy, this only happens if they think the law is unfair. A good case that illustrates democracy is the case of R v Pontin....
TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page...........................................................................................................i Approval Page....................................................................................................ii Declaration iii Dedication..........................................................................................................iv Acknowledgement..............................................................................................v Abstract ...............................................................................................