Why were the Greeks able to defeat the Persians in 480/79 B.
The Persian Empire had been going from strength to strength since Cyrus had become ruler of Persia in 559 B.C. Before he took power Persia had been a largely unimportant country in the area but after a short time Cyrus had conquered the majority of the Mediterranean area and the borders of his Empire stretched as far as Modern day Afghanistan and northern Africa, after his death the consequent successors to the role of leader were to also add to empire. There was however one missing piece to the empire and that was Greece that now found itself almost entirely surrounded by countries that were either directly controlled by their ancient enemies or were political allies of them. As their traditional enemies and the only country in the area resisting their power, it was inevitable that the Persians would have to invade. But how when surrounded and outnumbered by a such a huge power that had defeated most the countries it had gone to war with was Greece able to come out of their war with Persia victorious? I will look at whether it was superior tactics used by the Greeks that led to victory or was it the bad tactics used by the Persians that led them to defeat. I will also discuss the problems that faced both sides before and during the war to see if their were political reasons behind the outcome or was it simply down to the military to answer the question.
As with most wars their were long and short term causes that triggered the events in 480/79. Persia and Greece had long been antagonists towards each other with niggling grievances going back centuries but there was not another that influenced as much as Persia had done through culture, trade links and violence. The major trigger in this period however was from 494 the Ionian revolt, which eventually led to the Persians taking revenge on the Greeks for the sacking of Sardis by invading and seizing such cities as Argos and Thebes.