I believe the answer is yes, and it is why I would have decided the Supreme Court cases of Washington v. ... The choice of how one wishes to die falls squarely into this category. ... Since intimate and personal decisions are a protected due process right and there is no distinction between refusing life saving treatment and physician-assisted suicide then I believe that the plaintiffs in Washington v. ...
The act is designed to grant the citizens of Washington, DC voting representatives in the House of Representatives and the Senate. ... In fact, Washington, DC ranks second on the list of federal income tax paid per capita. ... It has an area of 63 square miles, larger than at least one country. ... The case of Washington, DC shows the United States to be in violation of this covenant. ... These principles are clearly violated by the status quo situation in Washington, DC. ...
After Philadelphia's convention, the new constitution was discussed in all town squares, and a report came from Philadelphia because it had made a bustle in the city. ... Those supporters were the Federalists, such as George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, and James Madison. ...
Just to name a few of his more famous inventions, he made a stepladder stool with a seat that turned up, his "Y-stick" that allowed him to reach books on high shelves, the Franklin stove, a clock with three wheels for hours, minutes, and seconds, bifocal glasses, made "magic squares", and made very helpful contributions to science by risking his life to find out more about electricity through his famous experiment of flying a kite with a key attached in a storm. ... He rejoiced in Washington's inauguration as the first president of the United States. ...
Woman suffrage is the right of women to vote. Today, women in nearly all countries have the same voting rights as men. But they did not begin to gain such rights until the early 1900's, and they had to overcome strong opposition to get them. Reading Jailed for Freedom has been like peeking into a w...
