1. Argumentaitve Essay - The Death Penalty
Presently, laws enforced upon society create controversy over if the rulings made are the morally correct decisions. ... While utilitarianism would view the consequence of killing the criminal as unjust because it makes the criminal suffer, I think a utilitarian would still think the death penalty is moral because the benefit it creates is greater than its consequences. ... In order to decide if the death penalty is just or unjust; utilitarianism has to question whether the death penalty is effective in preventing future crimes compared to life imprisonment. ...
We may not like the death penalty, but it must be available to punish crimes of cold-blooded murder, cases in which any other form of punishment would be inadequate and, therefore, unjust. ... Koch argues, justice requires that the law be applied equally to all. ...
But then there are the other number of people who feel the death penalty should be banned because of its cruel and unjust way of punishment. ... If someone is executed, our court system is deliberately defying our Lord's laws. ... But then there are the other number of people who feel the death penalty should be banned because of its cruel and unjust way of punishment. ... If someone is executed, our court system is deliberately defying our Lord's laws. ...
A bill to restore the death penalty almost passed as law in 1987; however Prime Minister Brian Mulroney had opposed the bill and it has not been brought back up since. ... The need for capital punishment is vital in our society, it is in the best interest of the majority of the population and it supports positive law. ... This will make it more likely for people to follow the law, if they know that they too might be sentenced to death. ... "There is no sin in administering punishment for those individuals who refuse to obey God's law" (Thomas Aquinas), any action necessary to ...
Capitol punishment Capital Punishment The Argument Against the Death Penalty The feeling of the condemned man was indescribable, as he was minutes away from being executed by an unjust decision. ... While there was physical evidence linking to the rape and murder of his sister-in-law, the case was built with weakness that caused many to question his guilt. ... His lawyer was only two years out of law school when his case was tried. ... The law leaves it up to the judges and juries to determine whether the defendants committing the crime should die or be imprisoned. ... It was claimed that ...
Justice O"Connor proceeds to say that she was "reluctant to adopt this conclusion as a matter of constitutional law without better evidence than we now possess" (Ewing 153). ... When it came time for the sentencing, the judge "acknowledged that the boy's youth was a substantial mitigating factor but refused, as a matter of law, to consider Monty's disturbed family life and emotional problems as substantial evidence" (Ewing 152). ... Five out of the nine Supreme Court Justices concluded that the "sentencing authority may not "refuse to consider, as a matter of law, any relevant mitiga...
I believe there is too much room for error in this law and it is too serious. ... All of the topics and theories I have covered in this essay, (race, utilitarian theory, retributivism theory and error) portray the negative attributes that contribute to an unjust and unfair system. ...
America's view on their justice system is very unclear, "we must reject the idea that every time a law's broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker. ... The use of the death penalty dates all the way back 1700 B.C. when Iraq implemented The Code of Hammurabi, which was a legal document that contained the first known death penalty laws. ... The solution to avoid unjust death penalties is the jury. ...
This means passing HR3214 into law and putting resources and technology in place to unmistakably determine the guilt of those on death row. ... We believe the death penalty should be used if it is the only possible way of defending human lives against the unjust aggressor. ... How ironic it is that in such a climate, our nation's top law enforcement official, Attorney General John Ashcroft, keeps pushing for the death penalty in federal cases, often overriding the recommendations of his local federal prosecutors - despite the fact that, as of this writing, jurors in 20 of the last 2...
Opponents of capital punishment who argue that this crime is improper or constitutional because it is disproportionately used against people of color and the poor mistake an argument against unjust applications of capital punishment for an argument against its use altogether. ... Why does the government deem murder against the law when, as a solution, they are executing those who commit murder, themselves? ... Why does the government deem murder against the law when, as a solution, they are executing those who commit murder, themselves? ... Very few countries still use capital punishment as a ...
When the case was won more than 600 death row inmates who were sentenced between 1967 and 1972 had their lives spared because the United States Supreme Court ruled that the capital punishment laws were "arbitrary and capricious." ... If the death of innocents because of judicial error is unjust, so is the death of innocents by murder....
Supporters of capital punishment, for example, contend that this punishment deters people from killing law enforcement officers. ... Many Christians began to accept the death penalty as permissible for the sake of justice, and for the sake of law and order that might prevent violence. ...
Juveniles are highly incapable of making reasoning and lifelong decisions. Teens are not allowed to drink, drive, nor can they sign their own parental consent; therefore, they are not capable of fully being responsible adults. Teens are not mature until they reach nearly the age 20. They lack reason...
It goes against the Nation's policy to enact something as unjust as the death penalty into our justice system. ... "A 1982 study in New York found that under the state's death penalty law each prosecution would cost taxpayers over $1.8 million through the first level of appeal. ...
The Law says that humans have inalienable rights that existed outside of and before government. ... It is evident, then that the proper purpose of law is to use the power of its collective force to stop this fatal tendency to plunder instead of work. All the measures of the law should protect property and punish plunder," (Bastiat 24-26). ... After all, if the law is set up to protect our right to live, it seems as though it should be able to keep convicted murderers from murdering again. ... Of course, there is a possibility of wrongly sending an innocent man to prison, or wrongly fining an...
Annotated Bibliography The Death Penalty for Juveniles The following research draws upon different opinions and perceptions for and against the further enactment of the death penalty for juvenile offenders. The various articles that are presented draw conclusions on the pros and cons of using the death penalty as punishment for young offenders. Numerous views surfaced in my research such as the views of president Bush, prominent authors and court officials as well as the views of individual states. In order to fully evaluate this sensitive topic I have presented a mixture of opposing p...