Throughout history, there has been an everlasting conflict between having a broader or narrower interpretation of the US Constitution. Some believe that the exact wordings stated in the Constitution are the rules to follow in a strict manner without any compromise. Others consider the Constitution to have looser understanding and there needs to be room for different analyses. ... His argument was that the statue and the resolution passed violated both the State and the Federal Constitution. ... By having any inclusion of church and state in any way violates the Constitution and citizen's ...

• Word Count: 3421
• Approx Pages: 14
• Has Bibliography
• Grade Level: Undergraduate

In both instances, under one ruling, the court, consistent with the sexually conservative morals of the time ruled in favor of the government, stating: "The protection given speech and press was fashioned to assure unfettered interchange of ideas for the bringing about of political and social changes desired by the people but implicit in the history of the First Amendment is the rejection of obscenity as utterly without redeeming social importance"#. To put it more simply, the First Amendment was designed to protect speech having even the slightest redeeming social importance, "even ideas ha...

• Word Count: 3509
• Approx Pages: 14
• Grade Level: Undergraduate