1. John Stuart Mill Defending Freedom Of Opinion
Conversely, John Stuart Mill objects to the proposed amendment to the constitution based on paternal legislation which is ruled out by the harm principle. ... Inevitably, growing up and seeing nothing wrong with the atrocious crime of murdering people based on religion, color of skin, and/or political values. ... This stereotyping is not based on reasonable facts or evidence; but based on personal prejudices. ... I oppose this proposed amendment to the constitution based on it being legal paternalism. ... First, the reason for banning the Neo-Nazi children stories is based on the judgmen...
- Word Count: 1507
- Approx Pages: 6
- Has Bibliography
- Grade Level: Undergraduate