1. Philosophy
It has been argued that Descartes provides the minor premise "I am thinking" and the conclusion "I exist" and therefore it is possible to define the major premise as "whatever is thinking, exists", demonstrating a syllogistic inference. ... Firstly this argument fails on the basis of his inability to have previous knowledge of the major premise "whatever is thinking, exists". ... In opposition to this interpretation of the use of "I", Lichtenberg claimed that the most Descartes could claim was that "there is thinking going on." ... He is claiming that Descartes has not basis to assume that the...
- Word Count: 1657
- Approx Pages: 7
- Grade Level: Undergraduate