1. Mapp V. Ohio
DECISION: Disagreement over the exclusionary rule, expressed in academic circles and the public, also was evident among the jurists. Six voted to overturn Mapp's conviction, but only five expressed full support for the exclusionary rule. Stewart, who voted with the majority, explicitly did so on other grounds. ... In the eyes of the Supreme Court, the first and primary rationale of the exclusionary rule is deterrence. ... The only person protected by the rule are the guilty against whom the most serious reliable evidence should be offered. ...
- Word Count: 847
- Approx Pages: 3
- Grade Level: High School