1. James Madison and the Federalist Ten
There was a lot of anti federalist things going on. But there was two differences between Federalist and Anti-Federalist. Now for Federalist it was about how the people that were agreeing with the Constitution these people were called the federalist people. ... But these three men were on of making the federalist together but had and argument about the documents that went on from the federalist part. ... So they had leaders of older regions helping them out to fight against the federalist people the revolution part of anti-federalist. ...
The Federalist Paper first appeared in the New York newspapers in 1787 during a period of decision for the newly and loosely formed States under the Article of Confederation. ... It established to persuade the States to ratify the Constitution and eventually the writers of the Federalist paper had accomplished their goal in passing the Constitution. The Federalist Paper was a collection of eighty-five essays that were published anonymously, under the pen name "Publius," in numerous of New York state newspapers of the time such as The New York Packet and The Independent Journal, and much mo...
The purpose of "The Federalist" papers by Alexander Hamilton and James Madison were to explain and defend the Constitution against the critics that believed it was taking away the rights the Americans had won in the Revolution. "The Federalist #17" discussed the insufficiency of the present confederation to preserve the union. "The Federalist #45" discussed the alleged danger from the powers of the union to the state Governments. ... Alexander Hamilton and James Madison showed their support for the needed change and transition by writing "The Federalist #17" and "The Federalist #45...
This was a true Federalist ideal, in which Hamilton's political power was increasing as well. ... Although Jefferson disagrees with Hamilton's idea of assuming the debt and criticizes the Federalist's principles, he is still aware that the Federalists are gaining tremendous power and support at this time. ... The Federalists were appalled, for they believed a commercial society was essential to their nation. ... The Federalists again changed their viewpoints during the War of 1812 when Webster, a Federalist, accused the Republicans of tyranny. ... The Republicans and Fede...
At the time of the ratification of the United States Constitution in 1791 those who supported it where called Federalist and those who didn't where called Anti-Federalist. ... The Anti-Federalist preferred the union as it was "well constructed and protective of its citizen's liberties."" ... Based on this belief the Anti-Federalist argued that against the adoption of the Constitution. ... While the federalist aimed to control minority faction through a system of checks and balance, the Anti-Federalist wished to eliminate faction as much as possible. ... With this mindset the An...
These people became known as the Anti-Federalist. ... In response came the Federalist Papers published in the New York Independent Journal under the author Publius. ... The Anti-Federalist arguments came from the experience with the British. ... The Federalist authors attempted to convey this message in each essay, until the constitution was finally ratified in July 1788. ... Madison's Federalist Paper # 46 in conjunction with Paper # 45 attempts to ease the concerns of many skeptics. ...
The Federalist Papers Alexander Hamilton wanted to help the ratification of the "new" Constitution, in 1787, so he decided that he would write and publish articles in order to explain the concepts of this Constitution. ... Although they are not part of the Constitution or legal documents, The Federalists Papers gained much popularity in the midst of the ratification of the Constitution. ... The Federalist Papers are best interpreted and understood through a republican argument and republican guidelines than those of democracy or other conflicting views. ... Another aspect of the Feder...
The Federalist Papers Alexander Hamilton wanted to help the ratification of the "new" Constitution, in 1787, so he decided that he would write and publish articles in order to explain the concepts of this Constitution. ... Although they are not part of the Constitution or legal documents, The Federalists Papers gained much popularity in the midst of the ratification of the Constitution. ... The Federalist Papers are best interpreted and understood through a republican argument and republican guidelines than those of democracy or other conflicting views. ... Another aspect of the...
Madison's major points are made in Federalist Papers ten and fifty-one. Madison's main concern in Federalist Paper number ten is that the Constitution provides the people with a government that protects them against factions. ... Federalist Paper number fifty-one stresses that there is a need for checks and balances between the diverse departments of the government: executive, legislative, and judicial. ... Alexander Hamilton's Federalist Papers, for example, was his way of anticipating federalism. ... Roche also went on to call Madison and Hamilton's Federalist Paper...
The XYZ affair played right into the hands of the Federalist Party. ... The Republicans debated against the bills for about a month, but the Federalist had the votes. ... Federalist saw this as a demonstration of support for the government. ... Republican newspapers were railing against the Federalist and especially against the Sedition bill. ... Baches ability to get the story out caused much consternation among Federalist. ...
Alexander Hamilton begins The Federalist No. 11 by explaining the importance of a Union to prospering commercial success and trade. ... Having clearly illustrated the positive effects of a Union towards the commercial prosperity of the United States in the last paper, Hamilton begins The Federalist No. 12 by explaining that the creation of a Union would drastically increase the revenue for the United Government as well as help to facilitate its collection. ... In The Federalist No. 13, Alexander Hamilton continues his previous discussion of national revenue by explaining how a united union in...
This indecision emanated into two distinct viewpoints or groups, creating the "Federalists" and the "Anti-federalists" of the time. The differences between these Federalists and Anti-federalists were made more apparent during the French Revolution, which widened the gap between them and, perpetuated the formation of the Federalist and Republican parties in time for the election of 1792. ... Led by Alexander Hamilton and John Adams, the Federalists based their views in the belief that a government should be run by a central power. ... The Federalists were horrified at the events of the Fren...
These two factions were the Federalists, chiefly lead by Alexander Hamilton, and the Jeffersonians, whose figurehead was Thomas Jefferson. ... Federalists were driven to base American economy both around agriculture and, unlike Jeffersonians, industry. Alexander Hamilton, who succeeded Washington in the presidency, was the main voice of the Federalist movement. ... Federalists were largely concerned with the possibility of a second revolution. ... The Federalists were in fact more sensible for their ideas of development. ...
The two leaders of the parties were Thomas Jefferson, Republican, and Alexander Hamilton, Federalist. ... As stated in the federalist papers they wanted to give all citizens the same options. ... It was more or less the Federalists attempt to win and end the controversy with the Republicans. ... The Republicans viewed the passing of the Seditions Acts as a part of the Federalists campaign to destroy them. ... Jefferson and the other Republicans viewed his election as the Federalists defeat. ...
This demonstrates the end of Federalist control in the United States. ... "Members of the 'Federalist' party," as stated in Document A, "were concentrated primarily among commercial and industrial interests of the northern states." ... Document B portrays Anti-Federalist ideas taken from the Declaration and Protest of Virginia. ... Anti-Federalists, also referred to as Republicans, criticized the Constitution for some time, complaining that it didn't have a Bill of Rights listing a person's basic freedoms. ...
The Republicans, which were made up of anti-federalists, were led by Alexander Hamilton. The Federalists, who were mainly from the north and lived in urban areas, wanted a broad interpretation of the law. ... The Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 said that the Federalists were going to disregard the constitution. Since there seemed to be no way of protecting the constitution from the Federalists, Madison and Jefferson turned to the state governments. ...
They were divided into two fractions known as the Federalists and the Anti-federalists. Hamilton became the leader of the Federalists and Jefferson was the leader of the Anti-federalists or Democratic Republicans. The main difference between these two fractions was that the Federalists advocated a strong central government where as the other group favored increasing the common man's role in government. ...
During the period of 1801-1817, the clash of the Republican views on the constitution were argued against the opinions of the Federalist. The Republicans believed in interpreting the constitution strictly, meaning that Congress or the President define the constitution as is- word for word, while the Federalist party held the opinions of broad constructionists, that Congress or the President had the right to interpret the constitution based on connotation. The Jeffersonian Republicans are usually characterized as strict constructionists who were opposed to broad constructionism of the Federal...
Hamilton took these ideas and along with James Madison and John Jay wrote The Federalist. The Federalist was a series of newspaper articles that defended the Constitution and were written in an effort to inform and sway New Yorkers to appreciating the convention's plan [http://xroads html]. The Federalist contained attacks on the Articles of Confederation, insights into human nature, evasions of Constitutional criticisms, and an explanation of the proposed operation of the new government. The Federalist also showed an insight into Hamilton's views on human nature. ... Hamilton and Ma...
Through his writings in the Federalist Papers, he contributed the largest number of essays, which helped to convince many individuals and states to ratify the Constitution. ... The fourth section focuses on the conflict within Washington's cabinet between Jefferson (secretary of state) and Hamilton (secretary of treasury), and the evolution of the Republican and Federalist parties. ... Hamilton could not be the president because he was not a native born citizen, but he played an important role in the nomination of candidates within the Federalist Party. ...
The Federalist Papers were written in an attempt to "sell" the Founding Fathers" new form of government to the American citizens. ... In Federalist Paper No. 46, Madison praises the Constitution for "preserving the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over people of almost every other nation" (Madison 46). ... Hamilton conveys his views that an armed citizenry was the best and only real defense against a standing army in Federalist Paper No. 29. ... The Federalist Papers serve to explain the proposed new form of government to the citizens who would later vote it into existence. ....
America Gains Independence: Now What? Declaring independence from one nation raises lots of issues of concern for the newly formed nation. Many issues of commerce, the establishment of political parties, the local industry, respect from other countries, and protection and expansion of borders. Thes...
After the ratification of the Constitution, the anti-federalists and the federalists had not evolved into political parties and there were no clear party divisions. ... In Jefferson's letter to Washington he explained concern and fear for the Federalists "sought to use the new government as a stepping stone to monarchy" while he then "professed his alignment with the republican party, who wish to preserve the government in it's present form" (Cunningham, 2000, p. 78). ...